Women are reluctant to identify as 'feminists'. Yet, much of what we have now is largely due to the efforts of radical women. I have read interviews of Camille Paglia, books by Betty Frieden and articles by Gloria Steinem, disections of pornography by Andrea Dworkin. But in an age of perceived freedoms and inclusion, is feminism dead or is there still a need for feminism and identification with such an 'ism'? I think yes. We have come far on the backs of feminists in the the 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's. What is left to do? My femin'ism' includes....
- Freedom from sexual marginalization via pornography, rape, abuse, disease.
- Right to reproductive freedom of choice.
- Right to protection under the law should women choose to engage is sex for sale.
- Women being equally represented across institutions
- A balance of responsibility in social expectations relating to child rearing and family life.
My biggest peeve is the balance between erotica and pornography. The latter being scene as the same as the former. Pornography lacks the focus of mutuality, sensuality, inner growth and connection. The pornography argument is that it is fantasy, so what harm exists in that. Or is it? How can something which reduces women to a series of orifices to be penetrated, something sensual and erotic? Are we not creating an unrealistic mental film reels that young men run through their minds as to what sexuality is? And killing the experience for women who are then to meet these young men?
It is hardly a simple matter of fantasy if there is no open discourse within society about what comprises healthy sexuality between consenting adults. It is not fantasy, but a guide book that perpetuates myths and gender stereotypes. Perhaps the biggest challenge is for women to 'own' their sexual identities and reclaim that which is lost when there is no open discourse.